Date: 09 October 2026 (Friday) Time: 2:30pm–5:45pm Language: English Level: Elementary
Speaker: Stephen Gallagher, Associate Professor in Practice of Law and Associate Dean (Teaching & Learning) at the Faculty of Law, The Chinese University of Hong Kong
Lawyer CPD / ACCA CPD / SFC CPT / Insurers’ CPD Pts: 3 points Fee: HK$1,800
Highlights:
This three-hour course will consider the doctrine of adverse possession and
its application in Hong Kong. The seminar will consider why the doctrine of adverse possession
continues to be recognised in Hong Kong, how the doctrine works and what a successful defence
or claim based upon adverse possession will achieve. The seminar will consider the
requirements to establish adverse possession including factual possession, and the evidence
which will establish the intention to possess. The seminar will consider the problems with
acknowledging the paper title owner’s rights in writing and the willingness to pay rent. The
seminar will consider the limitation period as against the government and leaseholders, and the
respective rights that a successful party will receive against the paper title holder and others. The
seminar will consider the limitations of the doctrine as asserted by one co-owner against their
fellow co-owners, and particular issues with the doctrine as against land held by a Chinese
customary trust (t’so and the t’ong). The seminar will consider the associated doctrine of
encroachment including how it works, what is required to establish encroachment and what the
successful party will receive by way of the doctrine. The seminar will conclude by considering
the appropriate orders that successful parties will be entitled to.
Course Outline: Some of the topics which will be covered in this course include:
– The origins of the doctrine;
– The elements of factual possession and intent to possess;
– Compelling evidence of factual possession (Chang Shun Tak v Leung Sun Fat HCA 13809/
1997);
– Does willingness to pay rent evidence an intent to possess? Comparing the approach of J.A.
Pye (Oxford) Ltd v. Graham [2002] UKHL 30, as against Wong Tak Yue v Kung Kwok Wai
[1998] 1 HKLRD 241, CFA;
– Can possession be adverse against co-owners? (Cheung Lai Mui v Cheung Wai Shing [2021]
HKCFA 19);
– Accumulation of time for relevant limitation periods;
– The doctrine of encroachment and its application in Hong Kong;
– Appropriate orders in successful cases Lam Sai Man v Minloy Limited%[2022] HKCA 37.
